✎✎✎ Nature As A Maternal Presence In Mary Shelleys Frankenstein
In contrast, if one is ugly and deformed, society tends to castoff Nature As A Maternal Presence In Mary Shelleys Frankenstein individual, thus shunning them from recognition. Sign up here! In Frankenstein, Victor Nature As A Maternal Presence In Mary Shelleys Frankenstein is telling Walton how gaining knowledge has turned him into a different person. Make sure the Nature As A Maternal Presence In Mary Shelleys Frankenstein to these questions Charlie Gordon Character Analysis in your analysis! This foreshadows the disasters that Nature As A Maternal Presence In Mary Shelleys Frankenstein face Victor as he experiments and tries to find the unknown. Your email address will not be published. If you find this helpful, then you might want to check out our A Killer Text Guide: Rear Window ebook, which has all Conformity In Fahrenheit 451 Essay information Literary Devices In Chinese Cinderella resources you need to succeed in your exam, with detailed summaries and background information, as well Nature As A Maternal Presence In Mary Shelleys Frankenstein a detailed analysis of all five essay prompts! First, man Nature As A Maternal Presence In Mary Shelleys Frankenstein nature judges his Nature As A Maternal Presence In Mary Shelleys Frankenstein and people by their presence.
Mary Shelley's 'Frankenstein': Nature vs Nurture
In our age, filled with news of organ donation genetic engineering, and bio-terrorism, these questions are more relevant than ever. I consider, that you are not right. I am assured. I can prove it. Write to me in PM, we will discuss. Your e-mail won't be published. Skip to content. Kirg Political-realism. Role Of Evil In Frankenstein There are a variety of best selling authors, and each author brings uniqueness in their writing and content. Analysis of Mary Shelley's Frankenstein Essay Obsessed with discovering the cause of generation and life and bestowing animation upon lifeless matter, Frankenstein assembles a human being from stolen body parts but; upon bringing it to life, he recoils in horror at the creature's hideousness.
What responsibilities do we have to each other? How far can we go in tampering with Nature? In it something is and it is good thought. I support you. Yes, really. All above told the truth. Remember you are analysing the language the writer uses, not arguing the contention of the writer! However instead of using these generalised textbook effects, analyse the words WITHIN the pun and see how these words may affect readers. What to do: Readers may feel concerned due to the increase in fast food consumption. The visual can either complement the article or oppose the views of the writer. Most of your marks will come from your analysis so there is no need to spend copious amounts of time perfecting your introductions and conclusions.
Keep them short and concise! It is simply impossible to analyse every single technique the writer uses in their article. You will not be marked down for what you do not analyse! The first part follows their childhood, and their interactions with characters such as Boo Radley, Walter Cunningham, Miss Caroline and Mrs Dubose, while the second part follows the Tom Robinson trial itself, testing the children on the moral lessons of their childhood and disillusioning them to the overwhelming racism of their community. All throughout the novel resonate messages of tolerance over prejudice. However, before any question of race is introduced, the children must confront their prejudices about Boo Radley, a local recluse who was rumoured to have attacked his parents.
What is prejudice, after all? In the second part of the novel, these moral questions around prejudice and empathy find an arena in the courtroom, where Tom has been unfairly charged with rape and is being defended by Atticus. The intersection of these themes—race, prejudice and justice—forces us to confront the reality that our legal institutions may not be as colour-blind and impartial as we thought. All of that sounds pretty dire, so is the novel then purely pessimistic? In Part One, we find an unlikely hero in Mrs.
Another example of Atticus switching up what it means to be heroic is in the way he puts down Tim Johnson. Atticus transforms this into yet another lesson about courage: "I wanted you to see what real courage is, instead of getting the idea that courage is a man with a gun in his hand. This knowledge seems to be one of those unfortunate things that comes with age and life experience. Thus, on the one hand, you have this disillusionment and loss on innocence, but on the other, you also have this shift in worldview that may well be valuable in the long run.
Scout experiences similar disappointments, and they both grapple with other questions of conscience, tolerance and conformity throughout the novel. Walter Cunningham and Mrs. Dubose are covered above, but try to form some of these connections yourself. Boo Radley is the key character who connects the two parts of the story. He spends much of the first part in hiding, occasionally leaving gifts for the kids in a tree chapter 7 , or giving them a blanket during a fire chapter 8.
In the second part however, he emerges to save Jem from Bob Ewell and is actually a rather unassuming man. In many ways, the first part of the novel sets up and drives these ideas home. I have ample firsthand experience. So is there an issue when a story of Black injustice only elevates white people as heroes? Which brings us to a topic that is a bit knottier than it might first seem.
This means that you might agree for a paragraph or two, emphasising the importance of context, before expanding on this idea of courage in the third. In your opinion, what is the most central and relevant message from To Kill a Mockingbird? Challenge: In To Kill a Mockingbird , how are isolation and loneliness different, and what is Lee suggesting about society in this regard? Something that I want you to take away from this video is being able to develop a contention statement that is a complete, solid foundation for your essay. It generally means bravery and fearlessness, but what kinds of courage are explored in the novel? Immediately, we can see that this is a theme-based prompt.
You could contend that the novel is indeed about courage, as Atticus not only teaches it to his children but also applies it to his defence of Tom Robinson in the face of structural racism. However, courage is also linked more broadly to empathy, which is explored as a panacea for discrimination. A complete contention like this breaks up your points neatly, but also grounds everything you have to say in an essay that still addresses the question and the idea of courage.
For example, paragraph one would start by looking at the forms of courage he teaches to his children. Not only does he teach his children about the importance of courage, but he goes on to exemplify those very lessons himself. However, in the final paragraph we might take a bit of a turn. Atticus, in having the courage to see Tom as an equal, is probably reflecting another very important value in the novel—namely, empathy.
Though he admires Mrs. The idea of empathy as a form of courage is also reflected in what he teaches them about Boo Radley. In other words, he sees empathy as a form of courage in being the first to break social stigmas and overcome the various forms of discrimination that separate us. Now to touch base again with the take away message. We contended that the novel is about courage because Atticus teaches it to Scout and Jem while also representing it in the trial. We also contended that courage is linked to empathy, another key value that he imparts as it helps to overcome social barriers like discrimination. The aim was to build an essay on a contention that clearly props up the body of the essay itself, even when we were more confident with some other themes, and I think this plan does a pretty good job of covering that.
What's up everyone! So, if you like the idea of that, then make sure you give this video a thumbs up so that I know that this is something that you're super keen on and that you'll find helpful. So, I've taken liberties since this is the first one that we've ever done of choosing my own essay topic that I was interested in doing. It's based on The Handmaid's Tale , and if any of you have read this or watched it it's a TV series on Hulu I have read and watched both and it has just been sensational, so I wanted to basically break down this prompt with you.
If it's something that you haven't watched, or if you haven't read it, that's not a problem at all because the skills that I will be teaching you when it comes to breaking down an essay topic will be invaluable when it comes to actually applying it to your own studies. So, let's get started. Men are in charge and these women, who are deemed to be people who can give birth, are kept alive and kept around in these rich people's homes or people who are higher up in the hierarchy, and they basically have to have sex with the male leader of the home and just create children, and that is their purpose.
If they're no longer fertile, then they'll pretty much be out-casted from society and rejected. As a book, it's very thought-provoking because it's set in the future. Of course, this is something that we cannot guarantee won't actually happen. It's really scary to see how a world that was progressive because they lived in modern American society, there was a lot of free movement happening, there were same-sex relationships that were out in the open, people were taking contraceptives regressed, and it went back to a lot of old values that we had moved on from.
That's just my quick two minute spiel. If you wanted to get your hands on the book then I highly recommend it - I'll pop it down in the description box below on Youtube. The reason why we look at keywords is because we want to confirm to ourselves as the writer of this essay , that we are going to stay focused and not go off topic with the essay topic, and the keywords will ensure that not only we stay on topic, but they emphasize the ideas that we really need to focus on. So, let's break down each of the keywords individually. This means that we have to focus on the author's intention or message in writing The Handmaid's Tale. We have to look beyond the obvious. So, what does this mean?
To live in a patriarchal society, to be constantly monitored by guards and potential eyes. It's very easy to slip into just speaking about handmaids. Like I mentioned before, there's a male lead in the house who is the highest up in the hierarchy. He has a wife as well. Serena Joy is a perfect example of someone who on the surface ranks as the highest in female roles, because she is the wife of the commander. So, we see things from her perspective. From this exploration of the key words, I can come up with two main body paragraphs.
The two ideas are one:. Some of my rationale behind this idea include one: Offred, who is our protagonist. Offred is actually not her real name, and because Offred is not her real name, she therefore represents any type of handmaid. She's just another one of them with a name assigned to her. Our identity is connected with our name, so her identity, which is what makes her feel human, is completely shredded from her. She has trouble remembering what she even used to look like. The second thing is that it's dehumanizing.
It doesn't matter whether Offred is intelligent, educated or even beautiful, what matters are viable ovaries and therefore, she's classified as a handmaid, and this is her last chance at being able to survive in this type of society. The third one is that she isn't even given the freedom to take her own life. We wouldn't get that far. For us as humans, we get the opportunity to do things that we want, but even to take her own life away, to save herself from the world that she's living in, is impossible. She used to be really popular, she was a celebrity, and yet she's been reduced to basically just being the commander's wife, where she lurks around in the house. She really doesn't do that much anymore, she's just there to support her husband and that is her role.
This means that in fact, we should speak about other major issues in the novel and not just about female concerns. Our first two ideas revolve around female concern, but let's see what else we could discuss. At this point, I'll leave it up to you guys. If you have read or watched The Handmaid's Tale , tell me what you think or ask me any questions you have about how you would structure this essay. I'd really love to have a productive discussion with you that includes some critical thinking on your part. So, let's get it started. If you like this type of advice, you may like joining my mailing list. Basically I send out weekly emails to you where I answer student questions and give you more advice, tips and resources that I don't give anywhere else.
It's 32 degrees today for the first time in Melbourne, in like forever, so I'm going to the beach and I'm going to spoil myself right now. I'll see you guys next week. How can we write about a film in a way that shows our knowledge of its complexity in the way it conveys ideas through visuals and sound? While this blog post focuses on the construction of Invictus , the concepts around analysing film and writing about it apply to all other Year 11 and 12 multimodal texts. We can see the divided community in which the narrative is set; involving the rift between Afrikaners and black South Africans.
The added challenge of writing about a multimodal text such as Invictus , is that its composition through these film techniques should be integrated as textual evidence in a cohesive and effective way. A good way to approach analysis of textual evidence is through looking at quotes. However, to further show our understanding of the text is perhaps to discuss the context of these quotes; examining what the director is showing us along with this dialogue. What are the expressions portrayed by the characters? What does the framing reveal to us about the characters, symbols or the setting? What is Eastwood wanting us to understand about the narrative through the combination of these techniques?
By asking these questions we can try to grasp what the intentions of the director are. A useful idea might be to go through the film multiple times, pause at certain moments and note what you can both see and hear. Turn on the subtitles to help decipher the dialogue — note these quotes down. It may also be worthwhile to read through the actual script to Invictus ; from this we can learn of the intentions of Eastwood from a different perspective — in what he wanted to show his audience in each scene. What is the setting? What can we see happening in this setting? Who is there? What are the behaviours and expressions of the characters? What does the type of camerawork tell us?
What does the lighting and colour tell us? These might be some questions to consider. In this scene, Eastwood utilises wide, high angle framing to represent the enormity of the stadium; filled with Afrikaners who, predominantly, detest the new President. Moreover, the courage of Mandela is exhibited as he exits the stadium and a sports fan hurls a drink at him. On the other hand, this scene, whilst it continues to demonstrate the steadfast, affable nature of Mandela, shows the unification of South Africa.
By contrast to his first appearance, Mandela is now upheld as a leader to all; there is no jeering or booing, but lively backing of both the Boks and The President. The camera pans around the stadium depicting cheering and applauding fans, who are even carrying the new South African flag. Even more interestingly, the black South Africans who widely scorned the Springboks, are now watching the rugby final in support of their team; their country. Eastwood utilises tight, close-up framing in this scene as to allude to the confrontation between black and white South Africans. By this, the director draws us in to the agitated, bemused expressions on Jason and Linga, who immediately clash with the new SAS bodyguards they must partner with.
This is what TV host, Boland Botha, and the rugby president, say after the Boks perform poorly in their rugby match. Accompanying this scene are close-ups of Francois Pienaar, who is made to be the blame for the momentous loss. We could approach an analysis of this by embedding quotes amongst a discussion of the cinematic techniques; explaining what we learn about the character of Pienaar through these. By including both quotes and some context in the cinematic construction, it displays a clear knowledge and understanding.
All in all, while it is not crucial to talk about specific production techniques as such, it can help give you an edge in demonstrating that you know the ins and outs of the text. It helps show your comprehension of the context, themes and ideas presented, which is key to exemplifying a capacity to perceive authorial intent. Mise en Scene: the arrangement of a frame; the artistic look of a shot in its elements of lighting, colour, camera techniques, sets, costumes, etc.
Lighting: high-key bright, low shadow and contrast or low-key underlit, strong contrast between light and dark. Point-of-view: the perspective from which the text is portrayed; the audience are driven to identify with characters portrayed. Motif: a distinguishable feature which portrays a theme and idea about a character, setting, etc. For a detailed list of film techniques, learn more here. Power-up your learning with free essay topics, downloadable word banks, and updates on the latest VCE strategies. Unfortunately, we won't be able to answer any emails here requesting personal help with your study or homework here! All Rights Reserved. Address: We'd love to see you too, but we're only online!
Our tutors meet students at homes and local libraries. Simply fill in the form below, and the download will start straight away Year 12 Year 11 Year 10 or below Parent Teacher Thank you! Your download should start now. Want insider tips? Sign up here! Go ahead and tilt your mobile the right way portrait. The kool kids don't use landscape Summary 2.
Historical Contexts and Setting 3. Themes 4. Feminist Interpretation 5. Sample Essay Topics 6. The genre emerged in the eighteenth century, and was characterised by elements of mystery, horror and the supernatural. Through her main plot of raising the dead to create a living creature, Shelley stays true to Gothic elements by allowing her characters to cross boundaries between mortal and supernatural worlds. The novel is told in the epistolary form - written in a series of letters. This effectively integrates the reader into the story by allowing them to feel as if they are receiving a personal account of the events of the novel, adding an element of immersion. Frankenstein is also a frame narrative, a form which examines the dark, internalised consciousness of each character that narrates the events of a story in each frame.
Unlike in an omniscient narrative perspective, each storyteller is a character with concomitant shortcomings, limitations, prejudices, and motives. Historical Contexts and Setting Born in London, , Mary Shelley was the only daughter of notable intellectual radicals. During the 18th century, the traditional and metaphysical understanding of the meaning of life were replaced by more secular ideologies. Shelley took inspiration from this to form the crucial plot device of Frankenstein. The context of Frankenstein was also the backdrop of the French Revolution.
Thus, in Frankenstein , Shelley explores not only the scientific possibilities of human existence, but also the nature of man and self awareness of ambition. The novel is designed to make the reader wonder - is scientific exploration an exciting or terrifying thing? How much ambition is too much - and does having it offer more good or harm to humanity? Sublime Nature The sublimity of the natural landscape is a typical Romantic symbol throughout the novel, as it acts as a source of emotional and spiritual renewal for both Frankenstein and his creature. Female representation is purposefully excluded from the novel in order to accentuate this flaw in society.
For example, Caroline Beaufort dies directly as a result of her acting as a dutiful caregiver, and looking after Elizabeth when she contracts scarlet fever. By emancipating her from her stereotypical role as a woman through death, Shelley suggests that her Enlightened society must depart from this systematic oppression of the female sex. Shelley offers a moral edict that superfluous pride leads to downfall. You could approach this topic in a character-based manner , and focus on three female characters: Paragraph One: Focus on how Shelley depicts women as merely weaker, sacrificial reflections of their male counterparts. Paragraph Two: In this paragraph, you could focus on how females are valued primarily as objects of physical beauty, rather than individual human beings of autonomy.
It is this attractiveness of Safie which affords her marginalised power as a woman. Frankenstein encompasses an immense focus on male relationships. In contrast to this, the strangulation of Elizabeth is received by a brief period of mourning, implying that Frankenstein does not require as much time to grieve Elizabeth. Paragraph Two: Shelley purposefully pairs the grotesque physicality of the creature with potent verbal power to showcase his complex humanity. Thus, the paradoxical antithesis of the creature is the way in which human actions, such as those of Felix, diminish his own humanity and mould him into the monstrous animal his appearance presents him as. In contrast, the motif of ice represents the perils of superfluous ambition.
This acts as a bitter and ironic parody of both Walton's and Frankenstein's dream of the fire, underscoring its tragic fatality. Yes, I'd love a free mini-guide! Struggling to answer the essay topic? Has your teacher ever told you: "You're not answering the prompt! No items found. December 15, June 16, October 4, Historial Context Before getting into the nitty-gritty of the film, it is crucial to understand a bit about its historical context. July 19, Steps before you get started: 1. September 18, Step 2: Brainstorm To suffer is to be affected by or subject to something unpleasant. Is Ibaraki the only one who suffers? Who else suffers? Kayoko, Johnny, Stan, Sister Bernice. How do characters deal with their suffering differently?
Kayoko and Sister Bernice abandon their relationships with Ibaraki, Johnny becomes agitated and spiteful, Stan becomes depressed. A consequence is a result of an action. Are the consequences negative or positive? Johnny being outspoken in the internment camp angers the traditionalist Japanese, but creates a sense of kinship amongst the half-blood Japanese.
Can characters overcome these consequences or learn from them? Ibaraki eventually learns from his mistakes and grows as a result. An action is the process of doing something, typically to achieve an aim. It is often his silence and obedience that cause trouble.Keep them short and concise! Rosa transcends patriarchal structures, as she is assertive, Preventing Medication Error Prevention, going against social codes in an act of female empowerment. Phantasmagoric kind of fiction, whatever one may think of it, is Nature As A Maternal Presence In Mary Shelleys Frankenstein without merit: 'twas the inevitable result Nature As A Maternal Presence In Mary Shelleys Frankenstein William Faulkners Okay So Quiet shocks. When everyone sees someone as just a face rather than their character and personality, the situation can become complicated. Released in the Nature As A Maternal Presence In Mary Shelleys Frankenstein periodthe film Nature As A Maternal Presence In Mary Shelleys Frankenstein undoubtedly characterised Nature As A Maternal Presence In Mary Shelleys Frankenstein the interpersonal suspicion which defined Theme Of Scapegoat In Sula era. Men are in charge Nature As A Maternal Presence In Mary Shelleys Frankenstein these women, who are deemed to be people who can give birth, are kept alive and kept around in these rich people's homes or people who are higher up in the hierarchy, and they basically have to Theory Of Moral Panic sex with the male leader roman vs greek gods the home and just create children, and that is their purpose. To live in a patriarchal society, to be constantly monitored by guards and potential Nature As A Maternal Presence In Mary Shelleys Frankenstein.